Cathleen東京・女性・20代・05-01 03:08
Th&1t#82a7;s actually not the silliest idea, but the risks of one person being a complete tool is probably a bit too high.But if you picked, say, thirteen people (two from each state, and throw one in from the combination of the ACT and NT), and require that a two-thirds majority is required to use the reserve powers, that’s probably good enough as the “in emergency, break glass” group. They could take it in turns to do the official duties.Heck, we trust 12 randomly selected people with jury duty.